Ministerial responsibility. In the course of their duties, Government Ministers in the United Kingdom exercise powers granted to them through statute, prerogative authority and debatably “general common law powers that allow for residual powers where their actions will have no legal consequence for others”.
Individual ministerial responsibility is not the same as cabinet collective responsibility, which states members of the cabinet must approve publicly of its collective decisions or resign. This means that a motion for a vote of “no confidence” in a Parliament is not in order, should the actions of an organ of Government fail in the proper discharge of their responsibilities.
The responsibility of individual ministers for their own conduct and that of their departments is a vital aspect of accountable and democratic parliamentary government. 1 Ministerial responsibility is often described as a constitutional convention, yet it is a convention.
Individual Ministerial Responsibility (IMR) IMR consists mainly of two aspects: firstly minister have to be responsible of department, actions carried out and duty to discharge responsibility laid down upon the secondly responsibility for personal and financial misconduct.
Individual Ministerial Responsibility is a constitutional convention that makes Government Ministers responsible for not only their own actions, but also for those of their department. It is not to be confused with collective cabinet responsibility, which states that cabinet members must approve publicly of its collective decisions or resign.
A good starting point for individual ministerial responsibility is the Crichel Crown Affair. This is a classic example of a minister accepting responsibility for his actions. An area of land was used as a bombing range by the Armed Forces.
The responsibility to which Herbert Morrison alludes to arises often in the context of when a minister should resign which has undergone some marked transformations over the years as the apparatus of Whitehall has exploded and powers have been invested in individual ministers: non-departmental bodies, public corporations and other agencies such as quangos(2) now complement ever-growing.
Whist you ought to view the concept of ministerial liability as a whole regarding overall liability to the electorate, it is important to tell apart between the two facets of ministerial responsibility ” collective and individual. GROUP RESPONSIBILITY. Collective ministerial responsibility requires all ministers presenting a united entrance.
Introduction. Individual Ministerial Responsibility (IMR) () is part of the wider doctrine of ministerial responsibility, which also includes Collective Ministerial Responsibility. According to Individual Ministerial Responsibility.
Individual Ministerial Responsibility (Name of the writer) (Name of the institution) Individual Ministerial Responsibility. Statement. The convention of individual ministerial responsibility is more concerned with accountability than with responsibility.
Ministerial responsibility is often described as a constitutional convention, yet it is a convention difficult to define with certainty and which, to a large degree, depends on the circumstances of each individual case. There is a distinction between individual ministerial responsibility and the collective.
There is also individual responsibility, which is the idea that a minister is responsible for whatever happens within his own department, whether he had oversight for it or not. So for example, Estelle Morris resigned in 2002 in the wake of a scandal surrounding A-level marking and other issues, though it is not suggested that she had any knowledge of the wrong-doing.
Collective and Individual Ministerial Responsibility: Should Ministers or Senior Bureaucrats be Held Accountable for the Department? For years, Canadians have stood by and watched as officials of the Canadian government have been questioned, accused and held up for public scrutiny on issues of misappropriation of funds, personal and public scandals, and inappropriate departmental spending of.
Ministerial Responsibility essaysFrom the offset, there is a conflict of principles regarding the so-called convention of ministerial responsibility. Romantically, the Queen can never be answerable to Parliament and if we see the Crown as the Executive, then ministers cannot be held accountable, ins.
Ministerial Responsibility The doctrine of collective and individual responsibility are effective tools in ensuring the accountability of ministers to Parliament - Justin Santiago Individual and collective responsibility are examples of conventions that form an important source of constitutional law.Ministerial responsibility, a fundamental constitutional principle in the British Westminster parliamentary system according to which ministers are responsible to the parliament for the conduct of their ministry and government as a whole. Ministerial responsibility is central to the parliamentary system, because it ensures the accountability of the government to the legislature and thus.Here, we can see a link between this example and individual ministerial responsibility. Individual ministerial responsibility is the convention that ministers are accountable to parliament for their personal conduct, the actions of officials within their department and the general conduct of their department and the policies they pursue.